Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow Summary

The summaries are clear, however...but towards the end, the author of the summary gave an (I think somewhat unfair) book review saying that it is tedious and fails miserably to reach 'lay readers' (his words, not mine), poor organization. The reviewer condescendingly accuses of Kahneman of being Kahneman to be condescending where he has been careful with his diction, which reminds me of the witch burning of the Bell Curve.The review is characteristic of the belief that everything can be and should be easy to understand. The author of the summary criticized the book to be poorly organized as well as employing its own 'unhelpful/invented' of vocabulary. I find this opinion grotesque because it is devoid of appreciation for the anthological nature the topics explored (the book should be seen as a compilation of cognitive biases) or Kahneman's intent to use precise language.I've read the original book as well I did not find it half as confusing as the author of the summary reviewed it to be.