Understanding Capital: Marx’s Economic Theory

First off, this is not a book to read if you want to know how Marx critiques capatalism. Sure that's touched on a little, but most of the book is devoted to pure economics, without any talk at all about how the economics comment on the way society, and capatalist firms function. The book is locked into numbers, and I'm guessing that it was meant to be used in a college course as a supplement. He says that his math is on the level of intermediate economics, and he's probably right, but don't expect him to do any explanation, he just plows on through, leaving those who aren't so lucky as to have taken up to intermediate economics courses left in the dust. No empirical analysis whatsoever, except for a calculation of the social surplus and the labor value of money. If your an economist you'll have a ball.

A very nice overview of the economics in Capital.

Alright, fine, I didn't actually finish this book, but I read enough of it to constitute adding it to my shelf (although I should really just be trading it in to a used bookstore, goddamn this vanity of mine).Reading Marx can be challenging, at first. Reading guides to Capital Volume I, and re-reading Volume I, were paramount to by comprehending it. Thus, I felt the desire to read Foley, before tackling Volume's II and III.Poor Foley. He simply isn't good at elucidating the abstruse. This is the second book I've read by him. The former was a popularizing of main stream economic thought. It paled in comparison to 'The Worldly Philosophers' by Heilbroner. And this book too pails in comparison to David Harvey's companion to Capital. Although Harvey's book is a companion, it can be read in isolation.Foley is attempting to explain all three volumes of Marx's Capital in 160 pages. The first 60 pages discuss Capital Volume I, and the remaining 100 pages, the other two volumes. In regards to the first 60 pages, again, one would be better off reading all 300 pages of Harvey, or even some of the other intro and beginners guides to Capital. Somehow Foley incorporates obscure algebra in places where it ought not to exist, and he has absolutely no flair, flash, or pizazz in his writing. The book is dryer than Arizona, and you'll be bored stiff by the end of chapter 1. Marx may be a difficult writer, and he may require multiple readings, and additional sources, but at least he added in a sense of humor, dynamic explanations, and literary gusto, to much of his works.I'd say I won't read Foley ever again, but I couldn't anyway because these are the only two books I've ever seen by him.

good book

Foley is the best. Clear writing style, well thought out. Will read at least a dozen times in my lifetime.

The reviews to this book misidentify this book as an introduction to Marx's Capital. If your intention is an introduction to Marx, than David Harvey's recent book "A Companion to Marx's Capital"  A Companion to Marx's Capital  is very impressive.Foley's book is "Understanding Capital." Rather than an introduction to Marx's economics, Foley's book is an elaboration of Marx's economic theory. Indeed it is an attempt to model Volume two of Marx's capital systematically. In this aim Foley's book is radically successful and indispensable reading for understanding what Marx is up to in Volume two of Capital (which is in turn based on the theoretical and historical accomplishments of Volume one, thus Foley also explains the essentials from Volume one as needed).In desperate brevity, in Volume two of Capital, Marx assumes the conditions for a crisis-free reproduction of a monetary market-system economy (what Marx calls "capitalism"). Marx's purpose seems to be to demonstrate how impossible these conditions are; hence he is actually demonstrating the necessity of crisis in a monetary market-system economy.Foley's intention is to model the conditions of crisis, which has to do with the temporal dimension of capital (i.e. the time difference between the moment of producing and the marketing/selling of a commodity, what Marx called the "circuits of money capital"), manifesting "disportionalities" between capital goods and consumer goods, in turn causing bottlenecks in financing/banking, which can create a general crisis, much like 2008, 1970s, 1929, 1880s, etc.Foley's elaboration of Marxian economics remains one of the most important developments in 20th century economics and deserves a new and wide audience in the wake of the 2008 crisis.What is important about Foley's elaboration is that even in absence of a class struggle, capitalism stills necessarily manifests general crises. This seems especially important in wake of the 2008 crisis in the U.S. Class struggle seemed to be minimized or latent at best; nonetheless, a financial crisis of Herculean proportions manifested, and would have brought down the entire economy, safe for the fact of Bush/Paulson socialism in the form of Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and Obama quasi-Keynesianism in the form of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The massive inequalities between 1% and 99% simply add in a political-economic complication for the hitch-free reproduction of U.S. corporate capitalism. Capitalism is crisis-prone (with or without class struggle), Foley's model based on an elaboration of Volume two of Marx's Capital, demonstrates this.

Had I known the level of mathematical technicality involved I would have never purchased this book.It is not a 'lucid' introduction at all; its a text for intermediate economic students.My advice is to avoid this book unless you have a good enough algebra required for intermediate economics degree students.A better option would be Ernst Mandel's 'Marxist Economic Theory'.He really is able to give a lucid description of Marx's economic arguments in 'Capital' (it's out of print but you may be able to get a second hand copy),another book you might like to try is 'The Revolutionary Ideas of Karl Marx' by Alex Callinicos.His chapter on capitalism is quite comprehensive and includes most of the major concepts from Capital vols 1 to 3 including use and exchange value,surplus value,constant and variable capital,organic composition of capital,accumulation of capital,the crisis of capital via the falling rate of profit,overproduction,under consumption,and the problem of the transformation of value into prices(and not an algebraic equation in sight).