ASUS ROG Strix 27” 4K HDR USB-C Gaming Monitor (XG27UCG-W) – White, UHD (3840x2160) Dual Mode (4K 160Hz or FHD 320Hz), 1ms, Fast IPS, ELMB Sync, G-SYNC Compatible, AI Gaming, 3yr Warranty

Overall good product. HDR in black background is acceptable. Cannot ask too much for edge-lit. Delivery is faster than expected.

الشاشه كا شكل جميلة الاستاند سيء و اي هزه في الطاولة و حتا ان كانت بسيطة تاثر على الشاشه و تهتز بشكل ملفت الالوان سيئه ولا تعبر عن 4K ابدا عندي شاشه asus rog XG279Q-W 2K و الوانها افضل بمراحل من الشاشه هذي ال 4K و الشاشه اساسا تعلق على 60 هيرتز و نظام القناتين لل 160 هيرتز 4K او 320 هيرتز 1K نظام سيء جدا مشيت بكل الخطوات الموجوده في كتاب المستخدم المرفق في الكرتون و للاسف اتضح لي اخر شي انه لل 4K يكون من 48 هيرتز الى 160 هيرتز على حسب الاستخدام و الاحتياج !!!!!!!!!!! يعني تخيل تلعب و انت تلعب فجاه تقلي 160 هيرتز و بس تطلع مثلا تعدل شيء في الماوس و ترجع للعبه و تقوم الشاشه ترجع 60 هيرتز !!!!!!!!!! منظر سيء سيء بكل معنى الكلمه .. تخيل تشوف تحرك الماوس و الاعب و كانه سلوموشن بس شوي مسرع نظام سيء جدا بكل معنى الكلمه رجعت لشاشتي السابقة و الي هي 2K بتردد 170 هيرتز (( ثابت )) افضل لي بمراحل طويلة و للعلم الشاشتين نفس الشركه المصنعه بنفس الفئة ولاكن فعلا بعض الانظمة الحديثه تحتاج تطوير الى ان تنزل بدون مشاكل و تشتريها النصيحه ان تبعد عن نظام الوضع المذدوج للهيرتز و الدقه

Todo bien

Get it used if you can bro, it'll help out a homie and not a greedy company. Aside from that, this thing owns. If you wanna kick ass at fps Asus is the way to go man. This one or a TUF

Gotta write a review on this product. Many of the so-called "features" are slightly gimped, but you get what you pay for. Where to start? First of all, I didn't buy this monitor for its dual switching 4k to 1080p mode. I bought it as an entry to 4k gaming. What I expected was a monitor that could push 160hz at 4k with low(ish) latency characteristic of IPS, and that is kind of what I got. 160hz technically is doable, but with an Nvidia graphics card, only over displayport 1.4a, and only after using the Nvidia app. Otherwise windows simply will not recognize 160hz as a supported refresh rate. It will lower the resolution to 1440p. The HDMI 2.1 port is gimped to 120hz (Asus says 144hz, but I couldn't get that much). Why? HDMI 2.1 has more bandwidth than displayport 1.4, and I bought a new cable just to get the most out of it. That's strike number 1. Additionally, many of the options that come with this monitor are greyed out and inaccessible when you start to tinker with other settings. I hope you like "racing mode," because you are going to be stuck on that if you want to use blue light filter. Want to use "dynamic dimming," say goodbye to ELMB (which I couldn't set up properly anyways). Want to adjust the gamma, don't try to use HDR, buddy! Hah! I had a top-of-the line ROG monitor from 2015ish. At the time it was the pinnacle, or close to it, of monitor technology. A 1440p, IPS panel that could turbo to 144hz with 5 ms response. The specs of this monitor are way better than that one, yet it feels like a downgrade. It is, to be fair, half the price, so it is a downgrade really. I think there is something profound to say here about how advances in technologically don't equate to advances in quality or value. By the way, this monitor does not possess a "real" HDR rating...it's vesa400 or something like that, and windows recognizes that. You can, with the help of the Nvidia control panel, bump the color up to 10-bit over displayport and turn on HDR in windows, so technically I guess it could be called 4k, 160hz in HDR...but only in a stretching-the-truth sorta way. My advice...for a couple hundred more bucks, an HDR certified monitor will provide better value...This is a case of you get what you pay for. It's no great deal, in my opinion. Also, amazon knocked an additional 15% off of the price the day after I bought it. Thanks Amazon! Looks like customers aren't buying it. They must have seen the writing on the wall.